![]() Regardless, I’m happy with what I am getting and it’s more hassle than it's worth to invite a Comcast tech to my home. If your router does not have a built-in test, the next best thing is to connect a Gigabit Ethernet cable from a laptop or desktop computer directly to the modem, bypassing the router. I’m paying for Comcast’s 1-gigabit per second service, but not getting the full speeds. But when I use the test built into that router, I get speeds between 700 and 800 Mbps. ![]() Both devices support WiFi 6, a newer WiFi protocol. Forbes screenshot.įor example, the image above shows a test from my iPhone 12 Pro Max via WiFi to my TP-Link AX-6000 router. The results of the HTML5-based speed tests conducted at Bandwidth Place ranged from 5Mbps to 11Mbps, those at exhibited a similar range, and the Flash-based tests at ZDNet's Broadband Speed Test recorded speeds from 5.8Mbps to 11.4Mbps.Use the app to find out how fast your internet connection really is. 's download scores in both its single- and multithread tests exhibited a bit more range than those of Speakeasy's Speed Test, but they averaged about 11.2Mbps. After running several tests over a span of days, all of Speed Test's download results were within a few kilobits of 11.5Mbps. Of course, the services' tests may be consistently wrong. The most consistent test results were recorded at Speakeasy's Flash-based Speed Test and at 's HTML5-based tester. Others point out that multithread tests such as those used by Ookla ( and branded by many ISPs) don't represent real-world network traffic as well as single-thread tests. ![]() ![]() Many experts claim HTML5-based speed tests are more accurate than tests that use Java and Adobe Flash. Does the type of speed test make a difference? ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |